lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 16:40:33 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Paul M Stillwell Jr <paul.m.stillwell.jr@...el.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, <vaishnavi.tipireddy@...el.com>,
 <horms@...nel.org>, <leon@...nel.org>, Pucha Himasekhar Reddy
 <himasekharx.reddy.pucha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/5] ice: configure FW logging

On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:40:04 -0700 Paul M Stillwell Jr wrote:
> OK, so what if we changed the code to create a new debugfs file entry 
> for each module and used the dentry for ther file to know what file is 
> being written to. Then we would only need to parse the log level. Would 
> that be acceptable?

Yes, even better!

> My confusion is around what makes the cmdline parsing harder to follow. 
> Obviously for me it's easy :) so I am trying to understand your point of 
> view.

Dunno how to explain it other than "took me more than 10min to
understand this code and I only had 10min" :)  Reviewers have
their own angle when evaluation code which doesn't always align
with the author's..

Powered by blists - more mailing lists