netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] pds_core: devlink health: use retained error fmsg API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:15:57 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@....com>,
	Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
	Cai Huoqing <cai.huoqing@...ux.dev>,
	George Cherian <george.cherian@...vell.com>,
	Danielle Ratson <danieller@...dia.com>,
	Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
	Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
	Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>,
	Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>,
	Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>,
	Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@....com>,
	Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
	Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>,
	Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerinj@...vell.com>, hariprasad <hkelam@...vell.com>,
	Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
	Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...dia.com>, Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] pds_core: devlink health: use retained
 error fmsg API

Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 01:06:54PM CEST, jiri@...nulli.us wrote:
>Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:53:33PM CEST, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com wrote:
>>Drop unneeded error checking.
>>
>>devlink_fmsg_*() family of functions is now retaining errors,
>>so there is no need to check for them after each call.
>>
>>Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
>>Signed-off-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
>>---
>>add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-57 (-57)
>>---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pds_core/devlink.c | 29 ++++++---------------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pds_core/devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pds_core/devlink.c
>>index d9607033bbf2..8b2b9e0d59f3 100644
>>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pds_core/devlink.c
>>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pds_core/devlink.c
>>@@ -154,33 +154,20 @@ int pdsc_fw_reporter_diagnose(struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter,
>> 			      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> {
>> 	struct pdsc *pdsc = devlink_health_reporter_priv(reporter);
>>-	int err;
>> 
>> 	mutex_lock(&pdsc->config_lock);
>>-
>> 	if (test_bit(PDSC_S_FW_DEAD, &pdsc->state))
>>-		err = devlink_fmsg_string_pair_put(fmsg, "Status", "dead");
>>+		devlink_fmsg_string_pair_put(fmsg, "Status", "dead");
>> 	else if (!pdsc_is_fw_good(pdsc))
>>-		err = devlink_fmsg_string_pair_put(fmsg, "Status", "unhealthy");
>>+		devlink_fmsg_string_pair_put(fmsg, "Status", "unhealthy");
>> 	else
>>-		err = devlink_fmsg_string_pair_put(fmsg, "Status", "healthy");
>>-
>>+		devlink_fmsg_string_pair_put(fmsg, "Status", "healthy");
>> 	mutex_unlock(&pdsc->config_lock);
>> 
>>-	if (err)
>>-		return err;
>>-
>>-	err = devlink_fmsg_u32_pair_put(fmsg, "State",
>>-					pdsc->fw_status &
>>-						~PDS_CORE_FW_STS_F_GENERATION);
>>-	if (err)
>>-		return err;
>>-
>>-	err = devlink_fmsg_u32_pair_put(fmsg, "Generation",
>>-					pdsc->fw_generation >> 4);
>>-	if (err)
>>-		return err;
>>+	devlink_fmsg_u32_pair_put(fmsg, "State",
>>+				  pdsc->fw_status & ~PDS_CORE_FW_STS_F_GENERATION);
>>+	devlink_fmsg_u32_pair_put(fmsg, "Generation", pdsc->fw_generation >> 4);
>>+	devlink_fmsg_u32_pair_put(fmsg, "Recoveries", pdsc->fw_recoveries);
>> 
>>-	return devlink_fmsg_u32_pair_put(fmsg, "Recoveries",
>>-					 pdsc->fw_recoveries);
>>+	return 0;
>
>Could you please covert the function to return void? Please make sure
>to do this in the rest of the patchset as well.
>
>Thanks!

Sorry, I messed up, this is a cb. Looks fine.

pw-bot: under-review

>
>pw-bot: cr
>
>
>> }
>>-- 
>>2.40.1
>>