lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <9fcf96ac-e480-fa22-7357-04760ed1e47d@intel.com> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:35:03 +0200 From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com> To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@....com>, Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>, Cai Huoqing <cai.huoqing@...ux.dev>, "George Cherian" <george.cherian@...vell.com>, Danielle Ratson <danieller@...dia.com>, Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, "Ariel Elior" <aelior@...vell.com>, Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>, "Igor Russkikh" <irusskikh@...vell.com>, Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>, "Brett Creeley" <brett.creeley@....com>, Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>, "Linu Cherian" <lcherian@...vell.com>, Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>, "Jerin Jacob" <jerinj@...vell.com>, hariprasad <hkelam@...vell.com>, "Subbaraya Sundeep" <sbhatta@...vell.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>, Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...dia.com>, Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] pds_core: devlink health: use retained error fmsg API On 10/17/23 13:15, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 01:06:54PM CEST, jiri@...nulli.us wrote: >> Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:53:33PM CEST, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com wrote: >>> Drop unneeded error checking. >>> >>> devlink_fmsg_*() family of functions is now retaining errors, >>> so there is no need to check for them after each call. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com> >>> --- >>> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-57 (-57) >>> --- >>> drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pds_core/devlink.c | 29 ++++++--------------- >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pds_core/devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pds_core/devlink.c >>> index d9607033bbf2..8b2b9e0d59f3 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pds_core/devlink.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pds_core/devlink.c >>> @@ -154,33 +154,20 @@ int pdsc_fw_reporter_diagnose(struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter, >>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) >>> { >>> struct pdsc *pdsc = devlink_health_reporter_priv(reporter); >>> - int err; >>> >>> mutex_lock(&pdsc->config_lock); >>> - >>> if (test_bit(PDSC_S_FW_DEAD, &pdsc->state)) >>> - err = devlink_fmsg_string_pair_put(fmsg, "Status", "dead"); >>> + devlink_fmsg_string_pair_put(fmsg, "Status", "dead"); >>> else if (!pdsc_is_fw_good(pdsc)) >>> - err = devlink_fmsg_string_pair_put(fmsg, "Status", "unhealthy"); >>> + devlink_fmsg_string_pair_put(fmsg, "Status", "unhealthy"); >>> else >>> - err = devlink_fmsg_string_pair_put(fmsg, "Status", "healthy"); >>> - >>> + devlink_fmsg_string_pair_put(fmsg, "Status", "healthy"); >>> mutex_unlock(&pdsc->config_lock); >>> >>> - if (err) >>> - return err; >>> - >>> - err = devlink_fmsg_u32_pair_put(fmsg, "State", >>> - pdsc->fw_status & >>> - ~PDS_CORE_FW_STS_F_GENERATION); >>> - if (err) >>> - return err; >>> - >>> - err = devlink_fmsg_u32_pair_put(fmsg, "Generation", >>> - pdsc->fw_generation >> 4); >>> - if (err) >>> - return err; >>> + devlink_fmsg_u32_pair_put(fmsg, "State", >>> + pdsc->fw_status & ~PDS_CORE_FW_STS_F_GENERATION); >>> + devlink_fmsg_u32_pair_put(fmsg, "Generation", pdsc->fw_generation >> 4); >>> + devlink_fmsg_u32_pair_put(fmsg, "Recoveries", pdsc->fw_recoveries); >>> >>> - return devlink_fmsg_u32_pair_put(fmsg, "Recoveries", >>> - pdsc->fw_recoveries); >>> + return 0; >> >> Could you please covert the function to return void? Please make sure >> to do this in the rest of the patchset as well. >> >> Thanks! > > Sorry, I messed up, this is a cb. Looks fine. Thanks :) I was also tempted to convert, but there are other possibilities of error to report from callbacks :) There are still some places in mlx5 that seems as possible candidates, but this series is big enough to draw the line here. > > pw-bot: under-review > >> >> pw-bot: cr >> >> >>> } >>> -- >>> 2.40.1 >>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists