lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231017082618.4558ad06@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:26:18 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Johannes Zink <j.zink@...gutronix.de> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>, patchwork-jzi@...gutronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: stmmac: fix PPS capture input index On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 11:12:53 +0200 Johannes Zink wrote: > > If it is a bug fix then it should probably be targeted at 'net', > > creating a dependency for the remainder of this series. > > > > On the other hand, if it is not a bug fix then perhaps it is best to > > update the subject and drop the Fixes tag. > > I added the fixes-Tag in order to make code archeology easier, but as it may > trigger picks to stable branches (which is not required imho), I have no > objections to dropping it for a v2. Would be good to clarify what impact on device operation the problem has. How would end user notice the problem? Does it mean snapshots were always or never enabled, previously? Note that if you submit this fix for net today it will still make it to -rc7 and net-next by tomorrow, so no major delay. We merge the trees on Thursday, usually.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists