[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTJuEaNWiHrQw-mg@u94a>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 20:09:53 +0800
From: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@...e.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 2/2] bpf: increase verifier verbosity when
in verbose mode
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 01:44:34PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 10/18/23 7:18 PM, Shung-Hsi Yu wrote:
> > Ah, good point. I was trying to separate out libbpf-related changes from
> > verbosity-increasing changes, hence the first patch. And there I add the
> > .kernel_log_level field within DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS() because that seems to
> > be how it's usually done.
> >
> > In the second patch I tried to make log-level changes consistent, having
> > them all done with `|= 2`, which isn't possible within
> > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS().
> >
> > Maybe I should have just have `open_opts.kernel_log_level = 1;` outside of
> > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS() in the first patch to begin with.
> >
> > +#if (LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION > 0) || (LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION >= 7)
> > + open_opts.kernel_log_level = 1;
> > +#endif
> >
> > Followed by
> >
> > #if (LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION > 0) || (LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION >= 7)
> > open_opts.kernel_log_level = 1;
> > + if (cfg->verbose)
> > + open_opts.kernel_log_level |= 2;
> > #endif
> >
>
> that is less confusing for a patch sequence.
Thanks for the review. Will do this in v2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists