[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <007e30c2fe785e2f3fd7ffae9b85b7903f46e48c.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 07:49:27 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, David Miller
<davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Kalle Valo
<kvalo@...nel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Wireless
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless
tree
On Thu, 2023-10-19 at 14:40 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:10:10 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > I fixed it up (I just used the latter, there may be more needed)
> >
> > Just using net-next/wireless-next is fine, I actually noticed the issue
> > while I was merging the trees to fix the previous conflicts here.
>
> Resolved the conflict in 041c3466f39d, could you double check?
I don't see anything there, but I guess that means it's good? Code looks
fine.
> Also, there's another direct return without freeing the key in
> ieee80211_key_link(), is that one okay ?
*sigh*
No, it's not. I think that means I resolved the previous merge there
incorrectly, because it's OK in wireless and broken in wireless-next,
and it had been fixed in d097ae01ebd4 ("wifi: mac80211: fix potential
key leak").
Anyway, thanks for checking and noticing! Will fix.
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists