[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72nc+pZ2fsNzNkaB01im92X1F4mhESZonyvD2G1rd9dNDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 14:05:53 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Cc: nmi@...aspace.dk, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
andrew@...n.ch, tmgross@...ch.edu, boqun.feng@...il.com, wedsonaf@...il.com,
benno.lossin@...ton.me, greg@...ah.com, ojeda@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/5] WIP rust: add second `bindgen` pass for
enum exhaustiveness checking
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 5:51 AM FUJITA Tomonori
<fujita.tomonori@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hmm, this works for me.
Andreas was probably using `O=`, but you were not.
At least that is what I guessed yesterday and what the suggestion I gave fixes.
This is also why sending unfinished work by someone else is not the
best idea. I would also have marked that patch as RFC and put it at
the end perhaps, to make it clearer.
By the way, the patch is missing your SoB. I would recommend using
`--signoff` in Git and b4's `am`, `cherry-pick` etc.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists