netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/5] rust: core abstractions for network PHY drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <06be812d-2371-4c75-88cc-d2a8466cc3bd@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 18:44:41 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, tmgross@...ch.edu,
	miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com, wedsonaf@...il.com, greg@...ah.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/5] rust: core abstractions for network PHY
 drivers

> Can we please change this name? I think Tomo is waiting for Andrew to
> give his OK. All the other getter functions already follow the Rust
> naming convention, so this one should as well. I think using
> `is_link_up` would be ideal, since `link()` reads a bit weird in code:
> 
>      if dev.link() {
>          // ...
>      }
> 
> vs
> 
>      if dev.is_link_up() {
>          // ...
>      }

is_link_up() is fine for me.

	Andrew