netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 5/7] ARM64: dts: marvell: Fix some common switch mistakes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231024202009.mq7fu7zetc3nfyum@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 23:20:09 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
	Enrico Mioso <mrkiko.rs@...il.com>,
	Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
	Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 5/7] ARM64: dts: marvell: Fix some common
 switch mistakes

Hello Chris,

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 08:10:14PM +0000, Chris Packham wrote:
> > Chris, does this look okay?
> 
> There's nothing in the u-boot code for the CN9130-CRB that cares about 
> the switch so I don't think there's any issue ABI wise. We are working 
> on our own CN9130 based router with a L2 switch but it's at a point we 
> can follow whatever upstream decide is the final schema.

Thank you for taking the time to confirm.

> In terms of my personal preference the schema quoted up thread has the 
> pattern  '^(ethernet-)?switch(@.*)?$' (i.e. the 'ethernet-' part is 
> optional) so I'd personally prefer switch0@6 -> switch@6 but that's only 
> a slight preference because I deal with Ethernet switches day in day out.

The movement originally came from "ports" to "ethernet-ports" at Rob's
suggestion, because of the name clash with the ports from graph.yaml.
Then we also did "switch" -> "ethernet-switch" because you'll also find
"pcie-switch" in mainline device trees.