[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231026084351.6bb4ba8a@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 08:43:51 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...nulli.us, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, toke@...nel.org, toke@...hat.com,
sdf@...gle.com, daniel@...earbox.net, idosch@...sch.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] netkit: use netlink policy for mode and
policy attributes validation
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 18:16:59 +0300 Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> static const struct nla_policy netkit_policy[IFLA_NETKIT_MAX + 1] = {
> [IFLA_NETKIT_PEER_INFO] = { .len = sizeof(struct ifinfomsg) },
> - [IFLA_NETKIT_POLICY] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> - [IFLA_NETKIT_MODE] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> - [IFLA_NETKIT_PEER_POLICY] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> + [IFLA_NETKIT_POLICY] = NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN(NLA_BINARY,
> + netkit_check_policy,
> + sizeof(u32)),
> + [IFLA_NETKIT_MODE] = NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN(NLA_BINARY,
> + netkit_check_mode,
> + sizeof(u32)),
> + [IFLA_NETKIT_PEER_POLICY] = NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN(NLA_BINARY,
> + netkit_check_policy,
> + sizeof(u32)),
I vote to leave this code be. It's not perfect. But typing it as binary
is not getting us closer to perfection.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists