[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d0f4578-f6f4-0c31-cbae-989305ab70d9@blackwall.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 19:02:32 +0300
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...nulli.us, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, toke@...nel.org, toke@...hat.com,
sdf@...gle.com, daniel@...earbox.net, idosch@...sch.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] netkit: use netlink policy for mode and
policy attributes validation
On 10/26/23 18:43, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 18:16:59 +0300 Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> static const struct nla_policy netkit_policy[IFLA_NETKIT_MAX + 1] = {
>> [IFLA_NETKIT_PEER_INFO] = { .len = sizeof(struct ifinfomsg) },
>> - [IFLA_NETKIT_POLICY] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
>> - [IFLA_NETKIT_MODE] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
>> - [IFLA_NETKIT_PEER_POLICY] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
>> + [IFLA_NETKIT_POLICY] = NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN(NLA_BINARY,
>> + netkit_check_policy,
>> + sizeof(u32)),
>> + [IFLA_NETKIT_MODE] = NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN(NLA_BINARY,
>> + netkit_check_mode,
>> + sizeof(u32)),
>> + [IFLA_NETKIT_PEER_POLICY] = NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN(NLA_BINARY,
>> + netkit_check_policy,
>> + sizeof(u32)),
>
> I vote to leave this code be. It's not perfect. But typing it as binary
> is not getting us closer to perfection.
TBH +1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists