[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTqSGOAjB+SHc9CJ@nanopsycho>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 18:21:44 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, ast@...nel.org,
andrii@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
toke@...nel.org, toke@...hat.com, sdf@...gle.com,
daniel@...earbox.net, idosch@...sch.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] netkit: use netlink policy for mode and
policy attributes validation
Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 05:43:51PM CEST, kuba@...nel.org wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 18:16:59 +0300 Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> static const struct nla_policy netkit_policy[IFLA_NETKIT_MAX + 1] = {
>> [IFLA_NETKIT_PEER_INFO] = { .len = sizeof(struct ifinfomsg) },
>> - [IFLA_NETKIT_POLICY] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
>> - [IFLA_NETKIT_MODE] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
>> - [IFLA_NETKIT_PEER_POLICY] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
>> + [IFLA_NETKIT_POLICY] = NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN(NLA_BINARY,
>> + netkit_check_policy,
>> + sizeof(u32)),
>> + [IFLA_NETKIT_MODE] = NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN(NLA_BINARY,
>> + netkit_check_mode,
>> + sizeof(u32)),
>> + [IFLA_NETKIT_PEER_POLICY] = NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN(NLA_BINARY,
>> + netkit_check_policy,
>> + sizeof(u32)),
>
>I vote to leave this code be. It's not perfect. But typing it as binary
>is not getting us closer to perfection.
Yeah :/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists