lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231026222548.rqbp5ktgo2mysl6w@skbuf> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 01:25:48 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> To: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com> Cc: GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, oss-drivers@...igine.com, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH next v2 1/3] ethtool: Implement ethtool_puts() On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 03:09:59PM -0700, Justin Stitt wrote: > Should I undo this? I want my patch against next since it's targeting > some stuff in-flight over there. BUT, I also want ethtool_puts() to be > directly below ethtool_sprintf() in the source code. What to do? (removing everyone except the lists from CC, I don't want to go to email arest because of spamming too many recipients) What is the stuff in-flight in next that this is targeting? And why would anything prevent you from putting ethtool_puts() directly below ethtool_sprintf()?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists