netdev - Re: [pull request][net-next V2 00/15] mlx5 updates 2023-10-19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZTrneUfjgEW7hgNh@x130>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:26:01 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [pull request][net-next V2 00/15] mlx5 updates 2023-10-19

On 24 Oct 18:02, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 23:46:05 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>>   - Add missing Fixes tags
>
>Fixes for bugs present in net need to go to net..
>We are pretty strict about that, is there any context I'm missing?
>

When I sent V1 I stripped the fixes tags given that I know this is not an
actual bug fix but rather a missing feature, You asked me to add Fixes
tags when you know this is targeting net-next, and I complied in V2.

About Fixes tags strict policy in net-next, it was always a controversy,
I thought you changed your mind, since you explicitly asked me to add the
Fixes tags to a series targeting net-next.

I will submit V3, with Fixes tags removed, Please accept it since Leon 
and I agree that this is not a high priority bug fix that needs to be
addressed in -rc7 as Leon already explained.

Thanks,
Saeed.