[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231026154632.250414b0@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:46:32 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Saeed Mahameed
<saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan
<tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [pull request][net-next V2 00/15] mlx5 updates 2023-10-19
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:26:01 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> When I sent V1 I stripped the fixes tags given that I know this is not an
> actual bug fix but rather a missing feature, You asked me to add Fixes
> tags when you know this is targeting net-next, and I complied in V2.
>
> About Fixes tags strict policy in net-next, it was always a controversy,
> I thought you changed your mind, since you explicitly asked me to add the
> Fixes tags to a series targeting net-next.
Sorry, I should have been clearer, obviously the policy did not change.
I thought you'd know what to do.
> I will submit V3, with Fixes tags removed, Please accept it since Leon
> and I agree that this is not a high priority bug fix that needs to be
> addressed in -rc7 as Leon already explained.
Patches 3 / 4 are fairly trivial. Patch 7 sounds pretty scary,
you're not performing replay validation at all, IIUC.
Let me remind you that this is an offload of a security protocol.
BTW I have no idea what "ASO syndrome" is, please put more effort
into commit messages.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists