netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Add JH7100 SoC compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <35556392-3b9a-4997-b482-082dc2f9121f@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 08:30:50 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
 Samin Guo <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>,
 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
 <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
 Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Add
 JH7100 SoC compatible

On 29/10/2023 23:15, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> On 10/29/23 13:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/10/2023 05:27, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>> The Synopsys DesignWare MAC found on StarFive JH7100 SoC is quite
>>> similar to the newer JH7110, but it requires only two interrupts and a
>>> single reset line.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml   |  1 +
>>>  .../bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml   | 74 +++++++++++++------
>>>  2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
>>> index a4d7172ea701..c1380ff1c054 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
>>> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ properties:
>>>          - snps,dwmac-5.20
>>>          - snps,dwxgmac
>>>          - snps,dwxgmac-2.10
>>> +        - starfive,jh7100-dwmac
>>>          - starfive,jh7110-dwmac
>>>  
>>>    reg:
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml
>>> index 44e58755a5a2..70e35a3401f4 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml
>>> @@ -13,10 +13,14 @@ maintainers:
>>>  
>>>  properties:
>>>    compatible:
>>> -    items:
>>> -      - enum:
>>> -          - starfive,jh7110-dwmac
>>> -      - const: snps,dwmac-5.20
>>> +    oneOf:
>>> +      - items:
>>> +          - const: starfive,jh7100-dwmac
>>> +          - const: snps,dwmac
>>> +      - items:
>>> +          - enum:
>>> +              - starfive,jh7110-dwmac
>>> +          - const: snps,dwmac-5.20
>>
>> Why do you use different fallback?
> 
> AFAIK, dwmac-5.20 is currently only used by JH7110.

What is used by JH7000?

> 
>>>  
>>>    reg:
>>>      maxItems: 1
>>> @@ -37,23 +41,6 @@ properties:
>>>        - const: tx
>>>        - const: gtx
>>>  
>>> -  interrupts:
>>> -    minItems: 3
>>> -    maxItems: 3
>>> -
>>> -  interrupt-names:
>>> -    minItems: 3
>>> -    maxItems: 3
>>> -
>>> -  resets:
>>> -    minItems: 2
>>> -    maxItems: 2
>>
>> You just changed it in previous patches... So the previous code allowing
>> one item was correct?
> 
> I mentioned the possible use-cases in the previous email. So yes, JH7110
> requires 2 resets, while JH7100 just one.

Your previous patch does not make sense now...

Best regards,
Krzysztof