lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <c4e6296d-f273-4b27-a33a-eee5c8f54aab@linux.dev> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 16:14:38 +0000 From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev> To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...a.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: add skcipher API support to TC/XDP programs On 02/11/2023 15:36, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 6:44 AM Vadim Fedorenko > <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev> wrote: >> >> On 01/11/2023 23:41, Martin KaFai Lau wrote: >>> On 11/1/23 3:50 PM, Vadim Fedorenko wrote: >>>>>> +static void *__bpf_dynptr_data_ptr(const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + enum bpf_dynptr_type type; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + if (!ptr->data) >>>>>> + return NULL; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + type = bpf_dynptr_get_type(ptr); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + switch (type) { >>>>>> + case BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL: >>>>>> + case BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_RINGBUF: >>>>>> + return ptr->data + ptr->offset; >>>>>> + case BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_SKB: >>>>>> + return skb_pointer_if_linear(ptr->data, ptr->offset, >>>>>> __bpf_dynptr_size(ptr)); >>>>>> + case BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_XDP: >>>>>> + { >>>>>> + void *xdp_ptr = bpf_xdp_pointer(ptr->data, ptr->offset, >>>>>> __bpf_dynptr_size(ptr)); >>>>> >>>>> I suspect what it is doing here (for skb and xdp in particular) is >>>>> very similar to bpf_dynptr_slice. Please check if >>>>> bpf_dynptr_slice(ptr, 0, NULL, sz) will work. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Well, yes, it's simplified version of bpf_dynptr_slice. The problem is >>>> that bpf_dynptr_slice bpf_kfunc which cannot be used in another >>>> bpf_kfunc. Should I refactor the code to use it in both places? Like >>> >>> Sorry, scrolled too fast in my earlier reply :( >>> >>> I am not aware of this limitation. What error does it have? >>> The bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr kfunc() is also calling the bpf_dynptr_slice() >>> kfunc. >>> >>>> create __bpf_dynptr_slice() which will be internal part of bpf_kfunc? >> >> Apparently Song has a patch to expose these bpf_dynptr_slice* functions >> ton in-kernel users. >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231024235551.2769174-2-song@kernel.org/ >> >> Should I wait for it to be merged before sending next version? > > If you need something from another developer it's best to ask them > explicitly :) > In this case Song can respin with just that change that you need. Got it. I actually need 2 different changes from the same patchset, I'll ping Song in the appropriate thread, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists