netdev - Re: [PATCH] Prevent out-of-bounds read/write in bcmasp_netfilt_rd and bcmasp_netfilt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 19:12:57 +0530
From: Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira@...mail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	florian.fainelli@...adcom.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	justin.chen@...adcom.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent out-of-bounds read/write in bcmasp_netfilt_rd
 and bcmasp_netfilt_wr

Hello Greg,
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 01:57:13PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> >  	reg_offset = bcmasp_netfilt_get_reg_offset(priv, nfilt, reg_type,
> >  						   offset);
> > +	if (reg_offset < 0)
> > +		return 0;
> 
> Shouldn't you return an error here?

Yes, I think that makes sense. I might just return `reg_offset`
since it is bound to be -EINVAL when bcmasp_netfilt_get_reg_offset
fails.

But that now makes me wonder whether the previous check in that
function which currently returns 0, shouldn't be returning `-EINVAL`
instead.

```
static u32 bcmasp_netfilt_rd(struct bcmasp_priv *priv,
...
{
	if (!IS_ALIGNED(offset, 4) || offset > MAX_WAKE_FILTER_SIZE)
		return 0;   <----- Should this one be -EINVAL?
}
```

Thank you for the feedback.

Yuran