[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1654342n-nn1q-959p-s6r0-3846psss5on6@vanv.qr>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2023 08:08:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
To: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
cc: Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Linux Network Development Mailing List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailing List <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: xt_recent: fix (increase) ipv6 literal buffer
length
On Saturday 2023-11-04 22:00, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
>
>IPv4 in IPv6 is supported by in6_pton [...]
>but the provided buffer is too short:
If in6_pton were to support tunnel traffic.. wait that sounds
unusual, and would require dst to be at least 20 bytes, which the
function documentation contradicts.
As the RFCs make no precise name proposition
(IPv6 Text Representation, third alternative,
IPv4 "decimal value" of the "four low-order 8-bit pieces")
so let's just call it
"low-32-bit dot-decimal representation"
which should avoid the tunnel term.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists