[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4053e838-e5cf-4450-8067-21bdec989d1b@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 09:46:47 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
To: Justin Chen <justin.chen@...adcom.com>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, cocci@...ia.fr,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: net: bcmasp: Use common error handling code in bcmasp_probe()
On 11/7/23 10:48, Justin Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 10:38 PM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote:
>>
>>>> Add a jump target so that a bit of exception handling can be better
>>>> reused at the end of this function.
>> …
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/asp2/bcmasp.c | 10 ++++++----
>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> The diffstat proves otherwise.
>>> Please don't send such patches to networking.
>>
>> How does this feedback fit to a change possibility which was reviewed by
>> Wojciech Drewek yesterday?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Markus
>
> We are making the code harder to follow with these changes. Also
> adding more lines than removing. Don't think this patch is an
> improvement IMHO. NAK on my end.
Likewise, at the very least, why not have the remove_intfs label
immediately above the of_put_exit one so then it just falls through, and
then obviously update the return path to drop the reference count and
return success?
--
Florian
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4221 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists