[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJq09z6NOLkury=kEa9SjiGPX=X7Pc3kAi4L88LOb=_DoD4ZzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:41:49 -0300
From: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, alsi@...g-olufsen.dk, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, arinc.unal@...nc9.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 3/5] net: dsa: realtek: create realtek-common
> > Some code can be shared between both interface modules (MDIO and SMI)
> > and amongst variants. For now, these interface functions are shared:
> >
> > - realtek_common_lock
> > - realtek_common_unlock
> > - realtek_common_probe
> > - realtek_common_remove
> >
> > The reset during probe was moved to the last moment before a variant
> > detects the switch. This way, we avoid a reset if anything else fails.
> >
> > The symbols from variants used in of_match_table are now in a single
> > match table in realtek-common, used by both interfaces.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
>
> As Krzysztof explained the dev_err_probe() call already prints
> ret. With that fixed:
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Thanks Krzysztof and Linus. I'll be fixed.
Is it ok to keep the series as a whole or should I split it?
Regards,
Luiz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists