lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231113172020.728cdf6a@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:20:20 -0500 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>, Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@...gle.com>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 12/12] selftests: add ncdevmem, netcat for devmem TCP On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 20:08:10 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote: > 1. For (b), would it be OK to implement a very minimal version of > queue_[stop|start]/queue_mem_[alloc|free], which I use for the sole > purpose of reposting buffers to an individual queue, and then later > whoever picks up your queue API effort (maybe me) extends the > implementation to do the rest of the things you described in your > email? If not, what is the minimal queue API I can implement and use > for devmem TCP? Any form of queue API is better than a temporary ndo. IIUC it will not bubble up into uAPI in any way so we can extend/change it later as needed. > 2. Since this is adding ndo, do I need to implement the ndo for 2 > drivers or is GVE sufficient? One driver is fine, especially if we're doing this instead of the reset hack.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists