netdev - Re: |PATCH] stmmac: dwmac-loongson: Add architecture dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231114194924.GH74656@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 19:49:24 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc: Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@...il.com>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: |PATCH] stmmac: dwmac-loongson: Add architecture dependency

On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 07:33:47PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 18:01:07 +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 03:45:22PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > Only present the DWMAC_LOONGSON option on architectures where it can
> > > actually be used.
> > > 
> > > This follows the same logic as the DWMAC_INTEL option.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
> > > Cc: Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > I'm not familiar with the hardware, so please let me know if the
> > > dependency needs to be adjusted somehow.
> > > 
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig |    2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > --- linux-6.6.orig/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig
> > > +++ linux-6.6/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig
> > > @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ config DWMAC_INTEL
> > >  config DWMAC_LOONGSON
> > >  	tristate "Loongson PCI DWMAC support"
> > >  	default MACH_LOONGSON64
> > > -	depends on STMMAC_ETH && PCI
> > > +	depends on MACH_LOONGSON64 && STMMAC_ETH && PCI  
> > 
> > Could we consider also allowing the build to occur if COMPILE_TEST is set?
> > This would maintain the current level of build test coverage.
> > 
> > Something line this (completely untested!):
> > 
> > 	depends on (MACH_LOONGSON64 || COMPILE_TEST) && STMMAC_ETH && PCI
> 
> Sure, that would be totally fine with me.

Thanks,

I think that if no one objects within the next day or so then posting a v2
would be a good next step.