[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <588c2b90-2f57-f40d-2dfe-0c0131788497@blackwall.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 11:47:02 +0200
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean
<olteanv@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv3 net-next 06/10] docs: bridge: add VLAN doc
On 11/15/23 11:23, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:54:36AM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>> +The `VLAN filtering <https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1360792820-14116-1-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com/>`_
>>
>> drop "The", just VLAN filtering
>>
>>> +on bridge is disabled by default. After enabling VLAN
>>
>> on a bridge
>>
>>> +filter on bridge, the bridge can handle VLAN-tagged frames and forward them
>>
>> filtering on a bridge, it will
>>
>> But here it sounds a bit misleading, as if vlan-tagged frames are not
>> handled otherwise. They are, just vlan tags are not considered when
>> making forwarding decisions (e.g. FDB lookup).
>
> How about:
>
> VLAN filtering on a bridge is disabled by default. After enabling VLAN filtering
> on a bridge, it will start forwarding frames to appropriate destinations based
> on their VLAN tag.
>
> Thanks
> Hangbin
How about a little tweak like: ... it will start forwarding frames to
appropriate destinations based on their destination MAC address and VLAN
tag (both must match).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists