netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] net: pse-pd: Add PD692x0 PSE controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 12:22:36 +0100
From: Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Luis Chamberlain
 <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Russ Weight <russ.weight@...ux.dev>, Greg
 Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
 <rafael@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] net: pse-pd: Add PD692x0 PSE controller
 driver

Thanks for your review!

On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 23:41:55 +0100
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:

> > +struct pd692x0_msg {
> > +	struct pd692x0_msg_content content;
> > +	u16 delay_recv;
> > +};  
> 
> > +	if (msg->delay_recv)
> > +		msleep(msg->delay_recv);
> > +	else
> > +		msleep(30);  
> 
> > +	if (msg->delay_recv)
> > +		msleep(msg->delay_recv);
> > +	else
> > +		msleep(30);  
> 
> > +	if (msg->delay_recv)
> > +		msleep(msg->delay_recv);
> > +	else
> > +		msleep(30);
> > +  
> 
> As far as i can see with a quick search, nothing ever sets delay_recv?
> 
> 	Andrew

In fact I wrote the driver taking into account that there are two commands (save
and restore) that need a different delay response. As currently we do not
support them I can indeed drop it for now and add it back when I will add their
support.

Regards,

-- 
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com