[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07171a9c-ef9c-4dcd-a977-61a7a068dfc6@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 17:30:41 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phylink: use for_each_set_bit()
> Hmm, indeed, thanks for spotting. I always forget whether I'll need to
> send a v2 for something this trivial or whether netdev folk will fix
> it up when committing it. I'm happy to resend.
You should resend. netdev patch acceptance is pretty bot driven, with
the normal 'fast path' not allowing the patch to be edited by the
merger.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists