netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phylink: use for_each_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZVeVrmhZ3GNuE9Yx@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:32:46 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phylink: use for_each_set_bit()

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 05:30:41PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Hmm, indeed, thanks for spotting. I always forget whether I'll need to
> > send a v2 for something this trivial or whether netdev folk will fix
> > it up when committing it. I'm happy to resend.
> 
> You should resend. netdev patch acceptance is pretty bot driven, with
> the normal 'fast path' not allowing the patch to be edited by the
> merger.

I think it does happen sometimes? Or maybe I'm misremembering with other
subsystems...

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!