[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iLmpfo-ihMpZwgCqcvF+bKdJ6is9q3Bks-sckmDz+5YHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:23:51 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/11] tcp: Cache sock_net(sk) in cookie_v[46]_check().
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 7:44 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> wrote:
>
> sock_net(sk) is used repeatedly in cookie_v[46]_check().
> Let's cache it in a variable.
>
What about splitting this series in two ?
First one, doing refactoring/cleanups only could be sent without the
RFC tag right away for review.
( Directly sent to netdev$ and TCP maintainers, no BPF change yet)
Then the second one with functional changes would follow, sent to bpf
and TCP folks.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists