[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231122183822.3255-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 10:38:22 -0800
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: <andrii@...nel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <dsahern@...nel.org>,
<haoluo@...gle.com>, <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <jolsa@...nel.org>,
<kpsingh@...nel.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <kuni1840@...il.com>,
<kuniyu@...zon.com>, <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, <mykolal@...com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <sdf@...gle.com>,
<song@...nel.org>, <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/11] tcp: Cache sock_net(sk) in cookie_v[46]_check().
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:23:51 +0100
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 7:44 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> wrote:
> >
> > sock_net(sk) is used repeatedly in cookie_v[46]_check().
> > Let's cache it in a variable.
> >
>
> What about splitting this series in two ?
That makes sense and would be easier to review/respin.
I'll post patch 1-8 to netdev first.
>
> First one, doing refactoring/cleanups only could be sent without the
> RFC tag right away for review.
> ( Directly sent to netdev$ and TCP maintainers, no BPF change yet)
>
> Then the second one with functional changes would follow, sent to bpf
> and TCP folks.
>
> Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists