[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231122115055.0731c225@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 11:50:55 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
amritha.nambiar@...el.com, sdf@...gle.com, horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v3 5/9] genetlink: implement release callback
and free sk_user_data there
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 19:20:58 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >I'm pretty sure I complained when it was being added. Long story.
> >AFAIU user as in if the socket is opened by a kernel module, the kernel
> >module is the user. There's no need to use this field for the
> >implementation since the implementation can simply extend its
> >own structure to add a properly typed field.
>
> Okay, excuse me, as always I'm slow here. What structure are
> you refering to?
struct netlink_sock. Technically it may be a little cleaner to wrap
that in another struct that will be genetlink specific. But that's
a larger surgery for relatively little benefit at this stage.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists