[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6bacb981-13fc-4d70-8a9d-721adb30f519@loongson.cn>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 20:49:53 +0800
From: Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: hkallweit1@...il.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, joabreu@...opsys.com, fancer.lancer@...il.com,
Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com, chenhuacai@...ngson.cn, linux@...linux.org.uk,
dongbiao@...ngson.cn, guyinggang@...ngson.cn, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, chris.chenfeiyang@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] net: stmmac: Allow platforms to set irq_flags
在 2023/11/21 21:59, Andrew Lunn 写道:
> Yes, i figure that out eventually. But it would be good to state it
> here.
>
> And trigger type, edge verses level, rising vs falling, is a per
> interrupt property. So you do need the flag per interrupt.
I see.
We decided to remove it in the next patch version, and to be honest, the
flag
is not being used at the moment, I have test it on the machine in the
last two
days. Thanks to this, I was able to make the first patch a bit smaller
as well.
Thanks for your review!
Thanks,
Yanteng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists