lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYmN4318b1wXwUOeFjPN0S2w8M9FpXHOs3LtFa+XoTxVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 15:51:01 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, 
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for framer infrastructure and PEF2256 framer

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 3:41 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 03:26:56PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 3:03 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > > If this gets applied it'd be good to get a signed tag based off Linus'
> > > tree so things that depend on it can be pulled into other trees (eg, the
> > > ASoC mapping for the framer).
>
> > Do you mean my pin control tree or the big penguins tree? :D
> > (I'm guessing mine.)
>
> I actually meant mainline there.

Ah based off, not residing in. My bad.

> > I thought this thing would be merged primarily into the networking
> > tree, and I don't know if they do signed tags, I usually create an
> > immutable branch but that should work just as fine I guess.
>
> Right, I'd expect a signed tag on the immutable branch - it's generally
> helpful to avoid confusion about the branch actually being immutable.

Makes sense, best to create that in the netdev tree if possible
I guess.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ