[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231130163655.GC32077@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:36:55 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, paul@...l-moore.com,
brauner@...nel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
kernel-team@...a.com, sargun@...gun.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 bpf-next 02/17] bpf: add BPF token delegation mount
options to BPF FS
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 11:03:54AM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
...
> @@ -764,7 +817,10 @@ static int bpf_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
>
> static void bpf_free_fc(struct fs_context *fc)
> {
> - kfree(fc->fs_private);
> + struct bpf_mount_opts *opts = fc->s_fs_info;
> +
> + if (opts)
> + kfree(opts);
> }
Hi Andrii,
as it looks like there will be a v12, I have a minor nit to report: There
is no need to check if opts is non-NULL because kfree() is basically a
no-op if it's argument is NULL.
So perhaps this can become (completely untested!):
static void bpf_free_fc(struct fs_context *fc)
{
kfree(fc->s_fs_info);
}
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists