[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231206120923.GA14115@ubuntu>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 04:09:23 -0800
From: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@...ori.io>
To: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: v4bel@...ori.io, imv4bel@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org, dhowells@...hat.com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
mkl@...gutronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] appletalk: Fix Use-After-Free in atalk_ioctl
Because atalk_ioctl() accesses sk->sk_receive_queue
without holding a sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, it can
cause a race with atalk_recvmsg().
A use-after-free for skb occurs with the following flow.
```
atalk_ioctl() -> skb_peek()
atalk_recvmsg() -> skb_recv_datagram() -> skb_free_datagram()
```
Add sk->sk_receive_queue.lock to atalk_ioctl() to fix this issue.
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@...ori.io>
---
net/appletalk/ddp.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/appletalk/ddp.c b/net/appletalk/ddp.c
index 9ba04a69ec2a..f240d5338bc9 100644
--- a/net/appletalk/ddp.c
+++ b/net/appletalk/ddp.c
@@ -1775,15 +1775,16 @@ static int atalk_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
break;
}
case TIOCINQ: {
+ long amount = 0;
/*
* These two are safe on a single CPU system as only
* user tasks fiddle here
*/
+ spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
struct sk_buff *skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
- long amount = 0;
-
if (skb)
amount = skb->len - sizeof(struct ddpehdr);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
rc = put_user(amount, (int __user *)argp);
break;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists