[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231206153540.GA36423@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 16:35:40 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...a.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Joao Moreira <joao@...rdrivepizza.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/cfi,bpf: Fix BPF JIT call
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 05:18:31PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> How about
> +int get_cfi_offset(void)
> +{
> + switch (cfi_mode) {
> + case CFI_FINEIBT:
> + return 16;
> + case CFI_KCFI:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CALL_PADDING
> + return 16;
> +#else
> + return 5;
> +#endif
> + default:
> + return 0;
> + }
> +}
Yeah, that works. I'll go make it happen.
> Separately we need to deal with bpf_for_each_array_elem()
> which doesn't look easy.
> And fix tcp_set_ca_state() as well (which is even harder).
>
> Just to see where places like these are I did:
> +__nocfi
> BPF_CALL_4(bpf_loop, u32, nr_loops, void *, callback_fn, void *, callback_ctx,
> +__nocfi
> static long bpf_for_each_hash_elem(struct bpf_map *map,
> bpf_callback_t callback_fn,
> +__nocfi
> static enum hrtimer_restart bpf_timer_cb(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
> +__nocfi
> static int __bpf_rbtree_add(struct bpf_rb_root *root,
> +__nocfi
> BPF_CALL_4(bpf_user_ringbuf_drain, struct bpf_map *, map,
> +__nocfi
> void tcp_set_ca_state(struct sock *sk, const u8 ca_state)
> +__nocfi
> void tcp_init_congestion_control(struct sock *sk)
> +__nocfi
> void tcp_enter_loss(struct sock *sk)
> +__nocfi
> static void tcp_cong_avoid(struct sock *sk, u32 ack, u32 acked)
> +__nocfi
> static inline void tcp_in_ack_event(struct sock *sk, u32 flags)
>
> and more... Which is clearly not a direction to go.
>
> Instead of annotating callers is there a way to say that
> all bpf_callback_t calls are nocfi?
Well, ideally they would all actually use CFI, I'll go figure out how
all this works and think about it. Thanks!
> I feel the patches scratched the iceberg.
Yeah, clearly :/ I'll go stare at it all.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists