lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 15:56:56 +0900
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
CC: <andrii@...nel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
	<daniel@...earbox.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuni1840@...il.com>,
	<kuniyu@...zon.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/3] selftest: bpf: Test bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk().

From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 22:39:33 -0800
> On 12/4/23 5:34 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > This commit adds a sample selftest to demonstrate how we can use
> > bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk() as the backend of SYN Proxy.
> > 
> > The test creates IPv4/IPv6 x TCP/MPTCP connections and transfer
> > messages over them on lo with BPF tc prog attached.
> > 
> > The tc prog will process SYN and returns SYN+ACK with the following
> > ISN and TS.  In a real use case, this part will be done by other
> > hosts.
> > 
> >          MSB                                   LSB
> >    ISN:  | 31 ... 8 | 7 6 |   5 |    4 | 3 2 1 0 |
> >          |   Hash_1 | MSS | ECN | SACK |  WScale |
> > 
> >    TS:   | 31 ... 8 |          7 ... 0           |
> >          |   Random |           Hash_2           |
> 
> Thanks for the details. It is helpful.
> 
> > 
> >    WScale in SYN is reused in SYN+ACK.
> > 
> > The client returns ACK, and tc prog will recalculate ISN and TS
> > from ACK and validate SYN Cookie.
> > 
> > If it's valid, the prog calls kfunc to allocate a reqsk for skb and
> > configure the reqsk based on the argument created from SYN Cookie.
> > 
> > Later, the reqsk will be processed in cookie_v[46]_check() to create
> > a connection.
> > 
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > +SEC("tc")
> > +int tcp_custom_syncookie(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> > +{
> > +	struct tcp_syncookie ctx = {
> > +		.skb = skb,
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	if (tcp_load_headers(&ctx))
> > +		return TC_ACT_OK;
> > +
> > +	if (ctx.tcp->rst)
> > +		return TC_ACT_OK;
> > +
> > +	if (ctx.tcp->syn) {
> > +		if (ctx.tcp->ack)
> > +			return TC_ACT_OK;
> > +
> > +		return tcp_handle_syn(&ctx);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return tcp_handle_ack(&ctx);
> 
> It may be useful to ensure tcp_handle_{syn,ack} is executed instead of the 
> kernel doing the regular syncookie. A global variable (bool or counter) can be 
> used by the prog_tests to check.

Sure, will add that check.


> 
> > +}
> > +
> > +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcp_custom_syncookie.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcp_custom_syncookie.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..a401f59e46d8
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcp_custom_syncookie.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/* Copyright Amazon.com Inc. or its affiliates. */
> > +
> > +#ifndef _TEST_TCP_SYNCOOKIE_H
> > +#define _TEST_TCP_SYNCOOKIE_H
> > +
> > +#define TC_ACT_OK	0
> > +#define TC_ACT_SHOT	2
> > +
> > +#define ETH_ALEN	6
> > +#define ETH_P_IP	0x0800
> > +#define ETH_P_IPV6	0x86DD
> > +
> > +#define NEXTHDR_TCP	6
> > +
> > +#define TCPOPT_NOP		1
> > +#define TCPOPT_EOL		0
> > +#define TCPOPT_MSS		2
> > +#define TCPOPT_WINDOW		3
> > +#define TCPOPT_TIMESTAMP	8
> > +#define TCPOPT_SACK_PERM	4
> > +
> > +#define TCPOLEN_MSS		4
> > +#define TCPOLEN_WINDOW		3
> > +#define TCPOLEN_TIMESTAMP	10
> > +#define TCPOLEN_SACK_PERM	2
> 
> Some of the above is already in the bpf_tracing_net.h. Move the non-existing 
> ones to bpf_tracing_net.h also.

Will move it.


> 
> > +#define BPF_F_CURRENT_NETNS	(-1)
> 
> This should be already in the vmlinux.h

I thought so, but the kernel robot complained ...
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/202311222353.3MM8wxm0-lkp@intel.com/

> 
> > +
> > +#define __packed __attribute__((__packed__))
> > +#define __force
> > +
> > +#define ARRAY_SIZE(arr)	(sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]))
> > +
> > +#define swap(a, b)				\
> > +	do {					\
> > +		typeof(a) __tmp = (a);		\
> > +		(a) = (b);			\
> > +		(b) = __tmp;			\
> > +	} while (0)
> > +
> > +#define swap_array(a, b)				\
> > +	do {						\
> > +		typeof(a) __tmp[sizeof(a)];		\
> > +		__builtin_memcpy(__tmp, a, sizeof(a));	\
> > +		__builtin_memcpy(a, b, sizeof(a));	\
> > +		__builtin_memcpy(b, __tmp, sizeof(a));	\
> > +	} while (0)
> > +
> > +/* asm-generic/unaligned.h */
> > +#define __get_unaligned_t(type, ptr) ({						\
> > +	const struct { type x; } __packed * __pptr = (typeof(__pptr))(ptr);	\
> > +	__pptr->x;								\
> > +})
> > +
> > +#define get_unaligned(ptr) __get_unaligned_t(typeof(*(ptr)), (ptr))
> > +
> > +static inline u16 get_unaligned_be16(const void *p)
> > +{
> > +	return bpf_ntohs(__get_unaligned_t(__be16, p));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline u32 get_unaligned_be32(const void *p)
> > +{
> > +	return bpf_ntohl(__get_unaligned_t(__be32, p));
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* lib/checksum.c */
> > +static inline u32 from64to32(u64 x)
> > +{
> > +	/* add up 32-bit and 32-bit for 32+c bit */
> > +	x = (x & 0xffffffff) + (x >> 32);
> > +	/* add up carry.. */
> > +	x = (x & 0xffffffff) + (x >> 32);
> > +	return (u32)x;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline __wsum csum_tcpudp_nofold(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> > +					__u32 len, __u8 proto, __wsum sum)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long long s = (__force u32)sum;
> > +
> > +	s += (__force u32)saddr;
> > +	s += (__force u32)daddr;
> > +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> > +	s += proto + len;
> > +#else
> > +	s += (proto + len) << 8;
> > +#endif
> > +	return (__force __wsum)from64to32(s);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* asm-generic/checksum.h */
> > +static inline __sum16 csum_fold(__wsum csum)
> > +{
> > +	u32 sum = (__force u32)csum;
> > +
> > +	sum = (sum & 0xffff) + (sum >> 16);
> > +	sum = (sum & 0xffff) + (sum >> 16);
> > +	return (__force __sum16)~sum;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline __sum16 csum_tcpudp_magic(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr, __u32 len,
> > +					__u8 proto, __wsum sum)
> > +{
> > +	return csum_fold(csum_tcpudp_nofold(saddr, daddr, len, proto, sum));
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* net/ipv6/ip6_checksum.c */
> > +static inline __sum16 csum_ipv6_magic(const struct in6_addr *saddr,
> > +				      const struct in6_addr *daddr,
> > +				      __u32 len, __u8 proto, __wsum csum)
> > +{
> > +	int carry;
> > +	__u32 ulen;
> > +	__u32 uproto;
> > +	__u32 sum = (__force u32)csum;
> > +
> > +	sum += (__force u32)saddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[0];
> > +	carry = (sum < (__force u32)saddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[0]);
> > +	sum += carry;
> > +
> > +	sum += (__force u32)saddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[1];
> > +	carry = (sum < (__force u32)saddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[1]);
> > +	sum += carry;
> > +
> > +	sum += (__force u32)saddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[2];
> > +	carry = (sum < (__force u32)saddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[2]);
> > +	sum += carry;
> > +
> > +	sum += (__force u32)saddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[3];
> > +	carry = (sum < (__force u32)saddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[3]);
> > +	sum += carry;
> > +
> > +	sum += (__force u32)daddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[0];
> > +	carry = (sum < (__force u32)daddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[0]);
> > +	sum += carry;
> > +
> > +	sum += (__force u32)daddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[1];
> > +	carry = (sum < (__force u32)daddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[1]);
> > +	sum += carry;
> > +
> > +	sum += (__force u32)daddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[2];
> > +	carry = (sum < (__force u32)daddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[2]);
> > +	sum += carry;
> > +
> > +	sum += (__force u32)daddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[3];
> > +	carry = (sum < (__force u32)daddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[3]);
> > +	sum += carry;
> > +
> > +	ulen = (__force u32)bpf_htonl((__u32)len);
> > +	sum += ulen;
> > +	carry = (sum < ulen);
> > +	sum += carry;
> > +
> > +	uproto = (__force u32)bpf_htonl(proto);
> > +	sum += uproto;
> > +	carry = (sum < uproto);
> > +	sum += carry;
> > +
> > +	return csum_fold((__force __wsum)sum);
> > +}
> 
> The above helpers are useful for other tests, so make sense to stay in 
> test_tcp_custom_syncookie.h. e.g. In the future, some of the duplicated helpers 
> in xdp_synproxy_kern.c can be removed.

Will post a followup patch after this series was merged.

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ