netdev - Re: [PATCH RESEND v1 1/7] dt-bindings: clock: mpfs: add more MSSPLL output definitions

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <CAJM55Z_ozf=MwOJCSM154L__TE1Gv7Ec=gM8LFJ31-_eX66OKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 09:40:00 -0800
From: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, 
	Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>, 
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, 
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, 
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v1 1/7] dt-bindings: clock: mpfs: add more MSSPLL
 output definitions

Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> There are 3 undocumented outputs of the MSSPLL that are used for the CAN
> bus, "user crypto" module and eMMC. Add their clock IDs so that they can
> be hooked up in DT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h
> index 79775a5134ca..b52f19a2b480 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@
>
>  #define CLK_RTCREF	33
>  #define CLK_MSSPLL	34
> +#define CLK_MSSPLL0	34

You add this new CLK_MSSPLL0 macro with the same value as CLK_MSSPLL, but
never seem to use it in this series. Did you mean to rename the CLK_MSSPLL
instances CLK_MSSPLL0?

> +#define CLK_MSSPLL1	35
> +#define CLK_MSSPLL2	36
> +#define CLK_MSSPLL3	37
> +/* 38 is reserved for MSS PLL internals */
>
>  /* Clock Conditioning Circuitry Clock IDs */
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives