[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:57:28 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Victor Nogueira <victor@...atatu.com>, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
daniel@...earbox.net, dcaratti@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net: sched: Make tc-related drop reason
more flexible for remaining qdiscs
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 5:28 PM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>
>
> So when we looked at this code there was some mystery. It wasnt clear
> how to_free could have more than one skb.
Some qdisc can free skbs at enqueue() time in a batch for performance
reason (fq_codel_drop() is such an instance)
I agree that all skbs in this list have probably the same drop_reason ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists