netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 7/7] sfc: add debugfs node for filter table contents

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:15:04 +0000
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, edward.cree@....com,
 linux-net-drivers@....com, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
 edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, habetsm.xilinx@...il.com,
 Jonathan Cooper <jonathan.s.cooper@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 7/7] sfc: add debugfs node for filter table
 contents

On 12/12/2023 16:19, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:14:17 +0000 Edward Cree wrote:
>> I will update the commit message to call out and explain this; I
>>  believe the code is actually fine.
> 
> Fair point, second time in a ~month we see this sort of false positive.
> I'll throw [^\\]$ at the end of the regex to try to avoid matching stuff
> that's most likely a macro.

Sounds good, thanks.

> This one looks legit tho:
> 
> +void efx_debugfs_print_filter(char *s, size_t l, struct efx_filter_spec *spec) {}

Yep, that one's real, will be fixed in v2.
And this time I'll actually build-test with CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n,
 which I forgot to do with v1 (sorry).

-ed