[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6258c258-b1c2-0856-aff7-cca33be15bf6@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:15:04 +0000
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, edward.cree@....com,
linux-net-drivers@....com, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, habetsm.xilinx@...il.com,
Jonathan Cooper <jonathan.s.cooper@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 7/7] sfc: add debugfs node for filter table
contents
On 12/12/2023 16:19, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:14:17 +0000 Edward Cree wrote:
>> I will update the commit message to call out and explain this; I
>> believe the code is actually fine.
>
> Fair point, second time in a ~month we see this sort of false positive.
> I'll throw [^\\]$ at the end of the regex to try to avoid matching stuff
> that's most likely a macro.
Sounds good, thanks.
> This one looks legit tho:
>
> +void efx_debugfs_print_filter(char *s, size_t l, struct efx_filter_spec *spec) {}
Yep, that one's real, will be fixed in v2.
And this time I'll actually build-test with CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n,
which I forgot to do with v1 (sorry).
-ed
Powered by blists - more mailing lists