[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18c695b4512.5afde007311004.1718468931473736202@siddh.me>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 22:53:58 +0530
From: Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Suman Ghosh" <sumang@...vell.com>,
"netdev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"syzbot+bbe84a4010eeea00982d"
<syzbot+bbe84a4010eeea00982d@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] nfc: llcp_core: Hold a ref to
llcp_local->dev when holding a ref to llcp_local
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:10:16 +0530, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > - if (sk_acceptq_is_full(parent)) {
> > - reason = LLCP_DM_REJ;
> > - release_sock(&sock->sk);
> > - sock_put(&sock->sk);
> > - goto fail;
> > - }
> > + if (sk_acceptq_is_full(parent))
> > + goto fail_put_sock;
>
> I would argue that you reshuffle here more code than needed for the fix.
>
> This should fix only missing dev reference, not reshuffle code. It's a
> bugfix, not cleanup.
So this should not be done? I did it because you told to extend the
cleanup label in v3 discussion.
Thanks,
Siddh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists