[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5b81005-e309-46df-b534-b24814d10006@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2023 19:14:27 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12 net-next] qca_spi: Improve SPI IRQ handling
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 04:09:34PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> The functions qcaspi_netdev_open/close are responsible of request &
> free of the SPI interrupt, which wasn't the best choice because
> allocation problems are discovered not during probe. So let us split
> IRQ allocation & enabling, so we can take advantage of a device
> managed IRQ.
Could you replace the kernel thread with a threaded interrupt handler?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists