[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42ddbe25-8acd-4959-ae84-269e943f7c84@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 10:34:41 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: net: phy: Document new LEDs
polarity property
> I do worry this continues to evolve until we've re-created the pinctrl
> binding...
Hi Rob
What is you opinion of the pinctrl binding? Should we just copy parts
of it?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists