[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce55a08f-ebe0-4e1b-a235-695e71611203@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 10:43:17 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: net: phy: Document new LEDs
polarity property
> On the marvell10g series we are discussing of using tristate or not. We
> notice tristate might be confusing, would it be better to use
> inactive-high-impedance ?
The pincfg-node.yaml binding has:
drive-open-drain:
oneOf:
- type: boolean
- $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
const: 1 # No known cases of 0
deprecated: true
description: drive with open drain
drive-open-source:
type: boolean
description: drive with open source
I'm not sure what the deprecated means. Is it that a value is
deprecated, not the property as a whole?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists