[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A660847B-FEFF-4AE1-809B-F0A6EBE2A52C@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 14:16:14 +0100
From: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] net: phylink: add quirk for disabling in-band-status for mediatek pcs at 2500base-x
Since using compatible is not an option and in and 2500base-x is hardware dependant, then I was thinking this would be useful.
bool pcs->ops->supports_inband(interface)
I'll be happy to invest some time in this, but I'll need to know which way to go, before I invest more time in something that would not be accepted.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists