[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Za/oeIjnMoqqp4Tt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:25:28 -0800
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, abeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
dsahern@...nel.org, weiwan@...gle.com,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/22] Fix MODULE_DESCRIPTION() for net (p2)
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 10:57:08AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:45:21 -0800 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > net: fill in MODULE_DESCRIPTION()s for Broadcom WLAN
> > net: fill in MODULE_DESCRIPTION()s for wlcore
> > net: fill in MODULE_DESCRIPTION()s for wl1251 and wl12xx
>
> Thanks for making progress on these!
>
> When you repost:
> - please send these 3 to linux-wireless as a separate series
> - make sure mailing lists are CCed on the cover letter
> (yes, get_maintainer is embarrassingly bad at its job)
> - please send 10 at-a-time, it's probably a good tradeoff
> between series size and reposting risk
> - please target net, I hope I convinced Paolo that it's okay :)
Sure. I will split this series in 3 and target `net`.
I suppose it is OK to send the patchsets in parallel, instead of waiting
for the first patchset to be reviewed/accepted before sending the second
part. Is this correct?
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists