netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/22] Fix MODULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:35:17 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, abeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
 dsahern@...nel.org, weiwan@...gle.com, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/22] Fix MODULE_DESCRIPTION() for net (p2)

On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:25:28 -0800 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > When you repost:
> >  - please send these 3 to linux-wireless as a separate series
> >  - make sure mailing lists are CCed on the cover letter
> >    (yes, get_maintainer is embarrassingly bad at its job)
> >  - please send 10 at-a-time, it's probably a good tradeoff
> >    between series size and reposting risk
> >  - please target net, I hope I convinced Paolo that it's okay :)  
> 
> Sure. I will split this series in 3 and target `net`.

The wireless ones need to target wireless, just to be clear.
The rest should fit into 2 series.

> I suppose it is OK to send the patchsets in parallel, instead of waiting
> for the first patchset to be reviewed/accepted before sending the second
> part. Is this correct?

The rate limit is to avoid having to give the same feedback to multiple
series, among other things. it'd be better to send one part at a time..
it won't take that long :)