[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a92ec3a9-10a2-40f5-83a4-81da51888d01@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 23:11:51 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: thinker.li@...il.com
Cc: sinquersw@...il.com, kuifeng@...a.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, song@...nel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
andrii@...nel.org, drosen@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v17 11/14] bpf, net: switch to dynamic
registration
On 1/19/24 2:50 PM, thinker.li@...il.com wrote:
> @@ -1792,6 +1799,12 @@ static inline int bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim(struct bpf_prog *prog,
> static inline void bpf_trampoline_unlink_cgroup_shim(struct bpf_prog *prog)
> {
> }
> +static inline int bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
> + struct btf *btf,
> + struct bpf_verifier_log *log) {
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
This part still does not look right. It is under the "#if
defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF)...".
No need to resend for now. I will try to adjust it unless I found other issues.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists