netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v17 11/14] bpf, net: switch to dynamic registration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 23:11:51 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: thinker.li@...il.com
Cc: sinquersw@...il.com, kuifeng@...a.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, song@...nel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
 andrii@...nel.org, drosen@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v17 11/14] bpf, net: switch to dynamic
 registration

On 1/19/24 2:50 PM, thinker.li@...il.com wrote:
> @@ -1792,6 +1799,12 @@ static inline int bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim(struct bpf_prog *prog,
>   static inline void bpf_trampoline_unlink_cgroup_shim(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>   {
>   }
> +static inline int bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
> +					   struct btf *btf,
> +					   struct bpf_verifier_log *log) {
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +

This part still does not look right. It is under the "#if 
defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF)...".

No need to resend for now. I will try to adjust it unless I found other issues. 
Thanks.