[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35ff4947-7863-40da-b0e7-3b84e17c6163@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:55:44 +0100
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Paul Durrant <paul@....org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 80/82] xen-netback: Refactor intentional wrap-around test
On 23.01.2024 01:27, Kees Cook wrote:
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ u32 xenvif_set_hash_mapping(struct xenvif *vif, u32 gref, u32 len,
> .flags = GNTCOPY_source_gref
> }};
>
> - if ((off + len < off) || (off + len > vif->hash.size) ||
> + if ((add_would_overflow(off, len)) || (off + len > vif->hash.size) ||
I'm not maintainer of this code, but if I was I would ask that the
excess parentheses be removed, to improve readability.
Jan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists