netdev - Re: [ANN] net-next is OPEN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240124085919.316a48f9@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:59:19 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
 "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 "netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org"
 <netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANN] net-next is OPEN

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:35:09 -0700 David Ahern wrote:
> > This is the latest run:
> > 
> > https://netdev-2.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net-mp/results/435141/1-fcnal-test-sh/stdout
> > 
> > the nettest warning is indeed gone, but the failures are the same:  
> 
> yep, I will send a formal patch. I see the timeout is high enough, so
> good there.

Well, kinda, to be honest I did bump the time to 4000s locally.
The runtime of the entire net suite 1h 10min - that's pretty much
the runtime of this one test :) The VMs run the tests without
HW virtualization, so they are a bit slower, but it'd be nice
if no local hacks were necessary. 

I haven't sent a patch to bump it because it may make more sense
to split the test into multiple. But as a stop gap we can as well
bump the timeout.

> > $ grep FAIL stdout 
> > # TEST: ping local, VRF bind - VRF IP                 [FAIL]
> > # TEST: ping local, device bind - ns-A IP             [FAIL]
> > # TEST: ping local, VRF bind - VRF IP                 [FAIL]
> > # TEST: ping local, device bind - ns-A IP             [FAIL]
> > 
> > :(  
> 
> known problems. I can disable the tests for now so we avoid regressions,
> and add to the TO-DO list for someone with time.

Sounds good!