[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240124090123.32672a5b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:01:23 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [ANN] net-next is OPEN
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:22:55 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Going through the failing ksft-net series on
> > https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/status.html, all the tests I'm
> > responsible seem to be passing.
>
> Here's a more handy link filtered down to failures (clicking on
> the test counts links here):
>
> https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?branch=net-next-2024-01-24--15-00&executor=vmksft-net-mp&pass=0
>
> I have been attributing the udpg[rs]o and timestamp tests to you,
> but I haven't actually checked.. are they not yours? :)
Ah, BTW, a major source of failures seems to be that iptables is
mapping to nftables on the executor. And either nftables doesn't
support the functionality the tests expect or we're missing configs :(
E.g. the TTL module.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists